Fair Employment And Housing Act (FEHA)

The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) is a critical component of employment law in the state of California, providing robust protections against discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination in the workplace. FEHA prohibits employers from terminating employees based on certain protected characteristics and ensures that employees have legal recourse when their rights are violated. In this comprehensive overview, we will delve into the key aspects of FEHA, including its legal framework, potential problems, legal consequences, and relevant examples.

FEHA is a comprehensive state law in California that prohibits unlawful employment practices related to various protected characteristics, including race, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability, marital status, national origin, and age, among others. FEHA applies to employers with five or more employees, including both public and private sector employers.

Key legal principles related to FEHA in wrongful termination cases include:

  1. Prohibition of Discrimination: FEHA prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of protected characteristics in any aspect of employment, including hiring, promotion, compensation, and termination.
  2. Retaliation Prohibition: Employers are also prohibited from retaliating against employees for engaging in protected activities, such as reporting discrimination or harassment, filing a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), or participating in investigations or legal proceedings.
  3. Reasonable Accommodation: Employers are required to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, including adjustments to job duties or work conditions, unless it would impose an undue hardship on the employer.

While FEHA provides substantial protections for employees, several potential problems and challenges can arise in the context of wrongful termination:

  1. Disputed Reasons for Termination: Employers may provide legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for an employee’s termination, such as poor performance or misconduct. This can make it challenging for employees to establish that their termination was based on a protected characteristic.
  2. Proving Discriminatory Intent: Employees alleging wrongful termination under FEHA must often demonstrate that their protected characteristic was a motivating factor in their termination, which can require significant evidence of discriminatory intent.
  3. Mixed Motive Cases: In some situations, an employer may have multiple reasons for terminating an employee, including both legitimate and discriminatory factors. Determining the primary motive for the termination can be legally complex.
  4. Retaliation Claims: Employees who engage in protected activities may still face retaliation from their employers. Establishing a causal link between the protected activity and the adverse employment action can be challenging.

Example 1: An older employee with a long history of positive performance reviews is suddenly terminated shortly after a new manager takes over. The employee believes that their age played a role in their termination. To prove wrongful termination under FEHA, the employee would need to show that their age was a motivating factor in the termination and that the employer’s proffered reasons for termination were pretextual.

Example 2: An employee reports sexual harassment by a coworker to their supervisor and HR. Subsequently, the employee faces increased scrutiny and negative performance evaluations, ultimately leading to their termination. In this case, the employee may have a strong retaliation claim under FEHA if they can demonstrate that the termination was in retaliation for reporting harassment.

FEHA is a cornerstone of employment law in California, offering robust protection against wrongful termination, discrimination, and harassment in the workplace. While it provides essential safeguards for employees, the legal framework can be complex, requiring employees to establish a nexus between the adverse employment action and a protected characteristic. Employers should be aware of their obligations under FEHA and take steps to ensure compliance to avoid legal consequences.

Employees should also be aware of their rights and seek legal counsel if they believe they have been wrongfully terminated or subjected to discriminatory practices. FEHA plays a vital role in promoting fair and equal employment opportunities in California, but navigating its intricacies requires a thorough understanding of the law and its application.

The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) is a comprehensive piece of legislation in California that aims to protect individuals from discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in employment. Here’s an extensive overview of FEHA in the context of wrongful termination and employment law:

  1. Scope: FEHA applies to public and private employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies in California. It covers employers with five or more employees, with some provisions applicable regardless of the number of employees.
  2. Protected Classes: FEHA prohibits discrimination against employees and job applicants on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status.
  3. Harassment and Discrimination: The Act forbids harassment and discrimination in the workplace based on any of the protected categories. This includes all aspects of employment, such as hiring, firing, promotions, job training, and compensation.
  1. Definition: Wrongful termination occurs when an employee is fired for reasons that are illegal under FEHA, such as discrimination or retaliation.
  2. Examples:
    • An employee is terminated after disclosing a disability or requesting disability-related accommodations.
    • A pregnant employee is fired due to her pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.
    • Termination in retaliation for complaining about or opposing discriminatory practices.
  3. Legal Consequences:
    • Employers found in violation of FEHA can face legal consequences including compensatory damages (such as lost wages and emotional distress damages), punitive damages, and attorney’s fees.
    • Employers may also be required to reinstate the employee or provide reasonable accommodations.
  1. Interactive Process Requirement: Employers are required to engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process to determine effective reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities.
  2. Retaliation Prohibited: FEHA specifically prohibits retaliation against employees who file discrimination or harassment complaints, participate in investigations, or oppose practices forbidden by the Act.
  1. Misclassification of Employees: Misclassifying workers as independent contractors can lead to FEHA violations if those workers are not afforded the protections given to regular employees.
  2. Inadequate Training: Employers who fail to provide proper training on FEHA compliance to their staff, especially those in managerial positions, might inadvertently create environments where discrimination or harassment occurs.
  3. Ambiguity in Policies: Vague or inconsistent application of workplace policies can lead to claims of discriminatory treatment under FEHA.
  • Preventive Measures: Employers should adopt comprehensive, clear anti-discrimination policies, provide regular training, and ensure proper channels for complaints to prevent FEHA violations.
  • Importance of Documentation: Maintaining thorough documentation of employment decisions can be critical in defending against wrongful termination claims.
  • Balance of Rights: Employers need to balance business needs with the rights of employees to create a fair and legal workplace environment.

FEHA plays a vital role in shaping the employment landscape in California. It not only provides protections to employees from discriminatory practices but also places significant responsibilities on employers. Navigating FEHA requires a thorough understanding of its provisions, and failure to comply can result in severe legal consequences for businesses. Regular training, clear policies, and an understanding of the diverse workforce are key to ensuring compliance with FEHA.

  1. Filing a Complaint:
    • Employees who believe they have been wrongfully terminated must first file a complaint with the DFEH.
    • The complaint should be filed within three years from the date of the alleged discriminatory act.
  2. Investigation by DFEH:
    • DFEH conducts an investigation into the complaint. This can include interviews, requests for documents, and other fact-finding methods.
    • If DFEH finds sufficient evidence, it can attempt to resolve the issue through mediation or settlement.
  3. Right-to-Sue Notice:
    • If the DFEH is unable to resolve the complaint or if the complainant chooses to bypass DFEH’s investigation, they can request a Right-to-Sue notice.
    • Obtaining this notice is necessary before one can file a lawsuit in civil court.
  4. Litigation:
    • If the case goes to court, it follows the standard litigation process, including discovery, motions, and possibly a trial.

  1. Meeting Deadlines: Failure to file a complaint within the specified time frame can result in the loss of the right to seek remedies under FEHA.
  2. Gathering Evidence: Proving wrongful termination can be challenging, as it often relies on demonstrating the employer’s intent or bias, which requires substantial evidence.
  3. Retaliation Concerns: Employees may fear retaliation from employers for filing a complaint, although FEHA offers protections against such actions.
  4. Financial and Emotional Toll: The process can be lengthy and emotionally draining for the complainant, and there is no guarantee of a favorable outcome.
  • Example 1: An employee is terminated shortly after disclosing a disability. If the termination lacks clear, non-discriminatory reasons, it could be considered wrongful under FEHA.
  • Logic: The timing and lack of clear justification could be seen as evidence of discrimination based on disability.
  • Example 2: An employee files a sexual harassment complaint and is subsequently demoted. This could be construed as retaliation, which is prohibited under FEHA.
  • Logic: The adverse employment action following a complaint can be perceived as retaliatory, especially if no other valid reason for the demotion is provided.

Navigating the legalities of FEHA in cases of wrongful termination requires a nuanced understanding of both the substantive rights protected under the Act and the procedural steps required to pursue a claim. The complexity of proving discrimination or retaliation, the strict timelines for filing complaints, and the intricacies of the legal process can pose significant challenges. Individuals considering action under FEHA are often advised to seek legal counsel to navigate these complexities effectively. Employers, on their part, must ensure compliance with FEHA to avoid legal pitfalls and foster a fair, inclusive workplace environment.

  1. Scope and Application: FEHA, governed by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), applies to employers, labor organizations, and employment agencies in California. This includes public and private employers with five or more employees.
  2. Protected Classes: The Act prohibits employment discrimination based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status.
  3. Prohibited Conduct: FEHA makes it illegal to discriminate against, harass, or retaliate against employees or job applicants in any aspect of employment, including hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, and training.
Call Now