Legal Framework for Employment Contracts

Damages- Breach of Employment Contract -Specified Term

Legal Framework for Employment Contracts

1. Specified Term Employment Contracts: These contracts delineate a specific duration for employment, contrary to the at-will doctrine. Breach occurs when either party terminates the contract without adhering to the terms agreed upon.
2. Enforceability: Such contracts must meet legal standards for enforceability, including clarity in terms, mutual consent, and consideration.
3. Breach of Contract: A breach occurs when an employer unlawfully terminates an employee before the end of the contract term without a legitimate reason or without following the contract’s termination provisions.

Legal Consequences of Breach

1. Damages: The primary legal consequence for wrongful termination of a specified term contract is the award of damages to the employee. This usually includes:
   • Lost Wages and Benefits: Covering the remaining period of the contract.
   • Consequential Damages: Additional losses incurred by the employee as a result of the breach.
   • Emotional Distress: In some cases, if the breach caused significant emotional harm.
2. Specific Performance: Rarely, a court may order specific performance, requiring the employer to continue employing the individual until the contract’s end. However, this is less common in employment law due to the personal nature of employment relationships.
3. Legal Fees and Costs: The prevailing party may also be entitled to recover legal fees and costs, depending on the contract’s terms.

Potential Problems and Challenges

1. Proving Damages: Quantifying lost wages and benefits can be straightforward, but calculating consequential damages and emotional distress is more complex.
2. Mitigation of Damages: The employee has a duty to mitigate damages, meaning they must make reasonable efforts to find comparable employment. This can affect the total damages awarded.
3. Ambiguities in Contract Terms: Vague or poorly drafted contracts can lead to disputes over whether a breach occurred.
4. Constructive Dismissal: Cases where an employee resigns due to intolerable working conditions (constructive dismissal) can complicate breach claims.

Examples and Reasoning

1. Early Termination Without Cause: An employee with a two-year contract is terminated after one year without cause. Damages could include the salary and benefits for the remaining year, provided the employee makes reasonable efforts to find new employment.
2. Breach Due to Company Closure: If a company closes unexpectedly, terminating all contracts, employees may claim breach. However, the company’s financial inability to pay might limit the actual damages recoverable.
3. Ambiguous Termination Clauses: A contract with a vague termination clause leads to a dispute. If the employer interprets the clause as allowing termination for performance issues, but the employee disagrees, a court would need to interpret the clause’s meaning.
4. Constructive Dismissal: An employee with a specified term contract resigns due to a hostile work environment. The employee claims breach of contract, arguing that the employer’s actions constituted a de facto termination.

Conclusion

In California, wrongful termination of a specified term employment contract can lead to significant legal consequences, primarily in the form of damages. The challenges in these cases often revolve around proving the extent of damages and interpreting contract terms. Both employers and employees must understand their rights and obligations under such contracts to avoid legal pitfalls and ensure fair and lawful employment practices. Legal advice is often necessary in these complex situations

________________________

Call 310-312-1100 Now to schedule a time to discuss your matter with Attorney John Michael Jensen.

Additional Information

Overview of Employment Contracts in California: In California, employment relationships can be categorized as either at-will or contractual. An at-will employment relationship can be terminated by either the employer or employee at any time, for any reason, with some exceptions. A contractual employment relationship, on the other hand, is governed by an employment contract that specifies the terms and conditions of employment, including the duration of employment.

Breach of Employment Contract with Specified Term: When an employer breaches an employment contract with a specified term, it generally means they have terminated the employee before the contract’s end date without legal justification. In such cases, the employee may have legal recourse against the employer for wrongful termination, and damages may be awarded.

Legal Consequences for the Employer:

1. Breach of Contract Claims: The employee may file a breach of contract claim against the employer for violating the terms of the employment agreement.
2. Damages: If the court finds in favor of the employee, the employer may be liable for various types of damages, including:
   • Compensatory Damages: These are designed to compensate the employee for losses suffered as a result of the breach. This may include lost wages, benefits, and any other financial losses directly related to the termination.
   • Consequential Damages: These are damages that result indirectly from the breach and may include costs related to finding a new job, relocation expenses, and additional financial hardships.
   • Punitive Damages: In some cases, punitive damages may be awarded if the employer’s conduct was particularly egregious or intentional.
3. Specific Performance: In rare cases, a court may order specific performance, requiring the employer to fulfill the terms of the contract and reinstate the employee.
4. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: Depending on the language of the contract, the prevailing party (usually the employee) may be entitled to recover attorney’s fees and litigation costs.

Problems and Challenges:

1. Proving Breach: The employee must demonstrate that the employer breached the employment contract. This can be challenging, especially if the contract terms are ambiguous or subject to interpretation.
2. Mitigation of Damages: The employee has a duty to mitigate their damages by actively seeking new employment. Failure to do so may limit the damages recoverable.
3. Causation: The employee must establish a causal connection between the breach of contract and the damages suffered. This can be complex in cases involving other factors affecting employment.
4. Employer Defenses: Employers may assert various defenses, such as a legitimate business reason for termination or that the employee breached the contract first.

Example:

Suppose an employee, Sarah, has a one-year employment contract with her employer, XYZ Corp. The contract explicitly states that she can only be terminated for cause. XYZ Corp terminates Sarah after six months without cause. Sarah files a wrongful termination lawsuit.

• If the court finds that XYZ Corp breached the contract, Sarah may be entitled to compensatory damages, including the wages and benefits she would have received for the remaining six months.
• XYZ Corp may argue that Sarah’s performance was subpar, constituting cause for termination, while Sarah may present evidence to the contrary.
• The court will consider the contract terms, evidence of performance, and any mitigating efforts by Sarah to find a new job.

Conclusion

In conclusion, breach of an employment contract with a specified term in California can have serious legal consequences for employers, including potential damages awarded to the wrongfully terminated employee. However, these cases can be legally complex, requiring a thorough examination of the contract, the circumstances of termination, and potential defenses. It is advisable for both employers and employees to seek legal counsel when facing such situations to ensure their rights and obligations are properly addressed under California law.

_____________________________

Call 310-312-1100 Now to schedule a time to discuss your matter with Attorney John Michael Jensen.

2422. Breach of Employment Contract—Specified Term—Damages

New September 2003

Directions for Use

Use CACI No. 3963, Affırmative Defense—Employee’s Duty to Mitigate Damages, if the defendant seeks an offset for wages plaintiff could have earned from similar employment.

Sources and Authority

• Damages for Breach of Contract. Civil Code section 3300.
• “Stated simply, the contract compensation for the unexpired period of the contract affords a prima facie measure of damages; the actual measured damage, however, is the contract amount reduced by compensation received during the unexpired term; if, however, such other compensation has not been received, the contract amount may still be reduced or eliminated by a showing that the employee, by the exercise of reasonable diligence and effort, could have procured comparable employment and thus mitigated the damages.” (Erler v. Five Points Motors, Inc. (1967) 249 Cal.App.2d 560, 562 [57 Cal.Rptr. 516].)
• In appropriate circumstances, the court may authorize the trier of fact to “consider the probability the employee would exercise the option in determining the length of the unexpired term of employment when applying the applicable

WRONGFUL TERMINATION   I No. 2422

measure of damages……… ” (Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc. (1971) 14

Cal.App.3d 198, 204 [92 Cal.Rptr. 127].)

• “The trial court correctly found that defendants wrongfully terminated the employment contract and that the measure of damages was the difference between the amount Silva would have received under the contract and that amount which Silva actually received from his other employment.” (Silva v. McCoy (1968) 259 Cal.App.2d 256, 260 [66 Cal.Rptr. 364].)
  • “The plaintiff has the burden of proving his damage. The law is settled that he has the duty of minimizing that damage. While the contract wages are prima facie [evidence of] his damage, his actual damage is the amount of money he was out of pocket by reason of the wrongful discharge.” (Erler v. Five Points Motors, Inc., supra, 249 Cal.App.2d at pp. 567–568.)
  • “The burden of proof is on the party whose breach caused damage, to establish matters relied on to mitigate damage.” (Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co. (1945) 26 Cal.2d 634, 654 [160 P.2d 804], internal citations omitted.)

Secondary Sources

Chin et al., California Practice Guide: Employment Litigation, 17-B, Contract Damages, ¶¶ 17:81, 17:95, 17:105, 17:495 (The Rutter Group)

Chin et al., California Practice Guide: Employment Litigation, 17-F, Mitigation of Damages (Avoidable Consequences Doctrine), ¶ 17:495 (The Rutter Group)

21 California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Ch. 249, Employment Law: Termination and Discipline, § 249.21 (Matthew Bender)

Call 310-312-1100 Now to schedule a time to discuss your matter with Attorney John Michael Jensen.